Speed and UX shape the app experience
Explore which actions feel lengthy, where frustration emerges and why a small task can still lead to a branch visit.
35 in-depth interviews with retail, SME and Premier customers: exploring mobile banking usability, adoption barriers and priorities for digital product development.

This project is set in Yerevan, Armenia, in 2024. The case concerns what HSBC Bank Armenia customers expected from the mobile app and internet banking at the time of the study.
A strong brand and trust in the bank provided a foundation for relationships, but the digital experience needed separate attention. Some customers did not know about available features; others encountered interface friction and compared the experience with local competitors.
The product team needed to understand where customers lost the ability or confidence to act independently. Some transactions felt too lengthy, others created fear of mistakes, while business and premium customers wanted capabilities tailored to their tasks.
The study connected everyday actions to expectations of digital banking. Its output was a foundation for product strategy: priorities for UX, customer education, business services and communication of digital capabilities.
The same request for human assistance can have different causes: a customer cannot find a feature, does not understand the next step, doubts the outcome or genuinely cannot complete the task online. Each cause calls for a different response—navigation, explanation, confirmation or a new capability.
Explore real situations: making a transfer, opening a deposit, seeking advice and managing business accounts. Clarify the context and desired outcome of each task.
Separate interface friction, missing information, fear of mistakes and functional constraints. Identify when customers switch to a call or a branch visit.
Compare routine transaction speed, learning needs, business payment management and expectations of personalized service.
Explore fast transfers, enhanced notifications and access to investment products through specific customer tasks.
Compare expectations with experiences of Ameriabank, InecoBank and ACBA while keeping the task context comparable.
Connect a need to a UX or service change, its risks and a validation method. Develop a foundation for decisions that the team can build on after the study.
Explore which actions feel lengthy, where frustration emerges and why a small task can still lead to a branch visit.
Understand what creates a sense of control: clear guidance, a transparent result or confirmation from a member of staff.
Clarify the need for fast business payments, company account management and mobile access to those tasks.
The study comprised 35 interviews across three customer groups: 20 retail customers, 10 SME representatives and five HSBC Premier customers. The retail sample included different age groups and both users and non-users of online banking.
Everyday tasks, differences in digital experience and confidence in taking action.
Payments, corporate accounts and mobile management of financial tasks.
Personalized notifications and expectations of access to investment products.
These group counts describe the research sample, not segment shares in the bank’s customer base. The 25–35 and 40+ insights concern retail customers; separate attendance counts for those age groups are not provided.
Recruiting retail and B2B audiencesDefine assumptions about speed, UX, customer education and business needs. Connect each hypothesis to an action that can be discussed in an interview.
Prepare a semi-structured guide covering usage context, recent transactions, difficulties, channel choice and expectations of new capabilities.
Conduct 40–60 minute discussions with the three customer groups. This format supports follow-up questions and a detailed account of the journey toward seeking assistance.
Turn interviews into text, identify themes and group statements by tasks, barriers and expected value.
Compare recurring motivations and differences between groups. Preserve the connection between an observation, its context and the product implication.
Explore transfers, deposit opening and advice, compare the experience with local alternatives and develop product directions.
A methodological explanation: questions move from real experience to the reasons behind difficulties and expectations of a solution. This explains the approach rather than reproducing the interview guide or customer responses verbatim.
Reconstruct a recent task: why it arose, where it started and what outcome the customer wanted.
Explore the screens, actions and confirmations involved, where information was sought and which steps felt unnecessary.
Ask what was unclear or worrying, how the customer explains it and what happened next.
Understand why a call, branch or another app became necessary. Separate habit, a need for reassurance and inability to complete the task.
Explore which instruction, prompt, feedback or capability would have helped.
Discuss a proposed feature through a concrete task and usage conditions. Ask what benefit the customer sees and what remains unclear.
The study used journey mapping for transfers, deposit opening and advice. The interpretation below details the task, potential friction, product direction and validation approach. Numerical stage-by-stage drop-off figures are not provided in the materials.
Too many steps, an unclear status or concern about entering details incorrectly can make a simple transaction difficult.
Simplify the route, clearly show material details before confirmation and explain the transaction outcome.
Assess completion, understanding of confirmation and reasons for contacting support. Speed needs to be considered alongside clarity and control.
Customers need to understand the product terms, consequences of their choice and the next steps. Uncertainty can lead them back to a member of staff.
Provide a clear information and application sequence, explain relevant terms in context and make help accessible.
Evaluate whether customers understand the proposition and can proceed. Use an agreed prototype or an operational flow for validation.
Speaking to an employee can be a way to confirm that an action is correct. Generic instructions may not address a specific concern.
Connect contextual prompts, micro-guides and access to a specialist. Assistance should be available alongside the customer’s task.
Assess answer clarity, repeat contact and the ability to continue the task after receiving advice.
Younger customers expect fast everyday transactions. A branch visit for a small task creates frustration.
Prioritize shorter digital routes and clear completion feedback. Reduce unnecessary steps and explain which tasks can be performed independently.
Customers worry about mistakes and prefer confirmation from an operator or manager. Clear instructions make them willing to learn digital actions.
Build learning into the experience through short guides, contextual assistance, clear status messages and access to human help when needed.
Entrepreneurs primarily want fast business payments and mobile access to corporate accounts.
Design around business tasks: preparing a payment, reviewing accounts and understanding statuses. A retail flow alone does not fully describe this need.
Premium customers expect tailored notifications and mobile access to investment products.
Personalization should provide relevant information and a clear route to the service. The precise investment capabilities require separate product and regulatory assessment.
The research compared experiences of HSBC Armenia, Ameriabank, InecoBank and ACBA. Local alternatives helped explain which journeys customers considered convenient and why. The framework below explains how such comparisons can be interpreted.
Compare a transfer with a transfer, deposit opening with a comparable application, and help with a similar request.
Consider step structure, action labels, explanations and outcome messages.
Distinguish contextual guidance, self-directed learning and contact with staff.
Use alternative experiences to explain expectations and develop hypotheses connected to a customer task.
The case does not publish bank rankings, transaction-time benchmarks or security ratings. The comparison provides research context for product hypotheses.
The five directions below retain the study’s recommendations and explain the customer value, product logic and follow-up validation for each.
Focus redesign on fast transfers, clear onboarding and useful notifications. Explain the action’s status and the next step when customers need it.
Hypothesis validationAssess task completion, friction, understanding of the outcome and reasons for requesting help.
Develop short instructions for specific transactions. Offer help in context and retain a clear way to reach a member of staff.
Hypothesis validationEvaluate whether customers can repeat an action independently, explain its outcome and proceed with confidence.
Explore simpler payment management and account analytics. The interface should follow an entrepreneur’s sequence of actions and make important statuses visible.
Hypothesis validationTest core business tasks on a prototype, overview clarity, navigation, error causes and requests for specialist assistance.
Consider integrating investment products and personalized notifications into mobile banking. Availability, product information and transaction requirements need separate assessment.
Hypothesis validationAssess service discovery, comprehension and completion of the relevant journey. Interview interest is not demonstrated demand or readiness to transact.
Build communications around everyday value, customer independence and understandable transactions. Messages must match the product’s actual capabilities.
Hypothesis validationTest understanding of the promise, recognition of a useful feature and progression to the intended action; compare the message with the quality of the actual flow.
The proposed follow-up logic connects recommendations to validation. Implementation timing and sequence depend on the product plan and team capacity.
Transfers, onboarding and notifications reveal the core product logic: can a customer find an action, complete it and understand what happened?
Evaluate micro-guides with people who need assistance, the SME Dashboard with entrepreneurs and premium features with the corresponding segment.
Compare customer value, implementation effort and observed test results. Establish a feedback process and reassess journeys over time.
The case materials identify intended effects of the product strategy. These should be treated as objectives and hypotheses until comparable post-implementation evidence is available.
Evaluation needs a baseline, comparable segments, consistent question wording and a follow-up after changes. The materials do not provide a numerical uplift measurement.
Track contact reasons alongside independent task completion. Fewer contacts alone do not show whether a customer’s problem was resolved.
The source presents this as a forecast, not an observed result. Validation requires a defined usage metric, baseline period, customer scope and actual subsequent change.
Brand-image change requires separate perception research. Journey improvements and communications should consistently reinforce each other.
The study revealed different sources of digital friction: younger customers value speed and less effort; customers aged 40+ need confidence and guidance; businesses want mobile financial tools; and Premier customers expect personalized access to relevant services. These differences informed directions for digital product development.
This case describes qualitative research and product recommendations in the historical context of 2024. The 35 interviews reveal motivations and barriers rather than statistical shares of the entire customer base. The journey and validation detail explains the research logic. The materials do not establish implementation of every recommendation, a measured NPS uplift or actual mobile-banking usage growth.
Explore real customer journeys, identify barriers and develop testable hypotheses for the interface, service and product strategy.