Sonder: why guests leave and where digital hospitality needs on-site support
Churn, hybrid service and direct-booking research: 60 diary stays, 45 interviews, 2,500 survey participants and audits of 40 locations. United States · 2025.
Sonder combined designed city apartments, space and a promise of hotel-level standards. Mobile access, contactless check-in and remote support replaced the conventional reception experience. The study examined how that model met expectations across different travel situations.
The digital and physical gap
Self-service could simplify routine tasks. Cleaning, noise, plumbing and equipment problems nevertheless required action on site. The research distinguished a fast digital response from a timely resolution of the actual problem.
The economics of repeat choice
External booking platforms brought commissions and acquisition dependencies. The app needed a clear reason for guests to book again directly. Installing it to access an apartment did not itself establish loyalty to the direct channel.
Project geography
The independent experience and service-model audit focused on New York, Miami, Chicago, Los Angeles and New Orleans. These markets provided the context for urban leisure and business stays.
02 / OBJECTIVES
Explain churn through specific guest experiences
Locate service failure points
Follow the journey from booking to departure, identifying where self-service works, when support is needed and where an app cannot resolve a physical problem on its own.
Understand contactless-service boundaries
Explore when the absence of reception provides privacy and convenience and when immediate help is essential, particularly for late arrivals, access failures and in-stay incidents.
Explain switching
Understand guests who tried Sonder and returned to hotels or conventional Airbnb. Alternative booking experience provided context beyond a general satisfaction score.
Assess direct-channel value
Explore what makes the app worth returning to, which protections guests expect from a direct booking and why platform guarantees may outweigh a digital key or a discount.
03 / METHODS
Observe, interview and cross-check
60 stays / incident diaries
Guests recorded apartment and support interactions as they happened, including smart-lock access, missing towels and noise. Diaries retained event sequences and reactions. A stay is not necessarily a unique individual.
45 in-depth interviews / churned guests
Hour-long interviews involved travellers who had stopped using Sonder and had made more than two hotel or Airbnb bookings during the previous year. Interviews reconstructed expectations, incidents, attempts to obtain help and subsequent switching.
2,500 participants / online survey
A US survey of apartment and boutique-hotel users examined service sensitivity across Solo Business, Couples and Group Vacation contexts. The sample size describes survey volume; detailed representativeness parameters are not supplied.
40 locations / mystery staying
Control stays assessed furniture and equipment condition, cleanliness, remote-support response and outsourced cleaning. Fieldwork compared the communicated proposition with the observed physical experience.
50,000+ reviews / review mining
Trustpilot and booking-platform reviews broadened the set of recurring issues. Reviews provide experience narratives and guest language, but their volume does not turn them into a representative population survey.
App telemetry and CRM
The methodology included app and CRM analysis to connect digital interactions with repeat choice. Extraction periods and record counts are not supplied, so no separate numerical business effect is attributed to these data.
Combining the streams
Diaries tracked events, interviews explained meaning, audits examined physical conditions, surveys explored travel contexts and reviews surfaced recurring themes. These sources answer different questions and are not a single combined sample.
04 / GUEST JOURNEY
From apartment selection to the next booking
01 / Search and booking
Guests compare space, photography, price, rules and protections. The question is whether hotel-service expectations match the support model and whether direct versus platform booking differences are clear.
02 / Preparation and arrival
Instructions, app installation and building access need to work at arrival. For a late check-in, a usable fallback matters as much as interface clarity when the self-service path fails.
03 / The stay
Cleanliness, functioning equipment, quiet and consistency with photographs test the proposition. Digital product value depends on the operational team’s ability to maintain physical standards.
04 / Incident and recovery
A guest reports a problem, waits for acknowledgement, arranges staff access and expects resolution. A fast reply without action may deepen helplessness, making response and resolution distinct analytical moments.
05 / Departure and return
Invoices, luggage, late checkout and unresolved issues influence the overall impression and next booking. This journey is an editorial expansion of the stages described in the supplied project materials.
05 / INSIGHTS
Four sources of lost trust
01 / A chat cannot repair an apartment
The case reports helplessness and negative brand sentiment among 72% of guests affected by the problems under study. Remote support could handle routine questions, while leaks or failed air conditioning needed physical intervention. This percentage concerns the affected group, not all Sonder guests.
02 / Photography creates a standard to maintain
A distributed apartment portfolio made condition control more complex. Worn furniture and minor defects conflicted with promotional images. Perceived quality depended on repeated checks and repair before another guest arrived.
03 / Direct bookings need protection and benefits
The supplied case states that 64% of guests chose third-party platforms for protection and familiar loyalty benefits. App awareness alone did not cause a switch. A direct channel needed distinct value, clear conditions and confidence in support.
04 / Business travel needs practical flexibility
Specific invoices, a short extension or secure luggage storage can be essential in a business trip. Inability to resolve these tasks promptly weakened the model for travellers prioritising time and predictability.
06 / TRAVEL SCENARIOS
One interface, different support needs
Solo Business
Documents, arrival timing, reliable access and changes to a stay are important. Flexibility should be understandable before booking and accessible without prolonged messaging.
Couples
Privacy and convenient self-check-in can support apartment appeal. Noise, a breakdown or a mismatch with photography can still redefine the whole trip and require predictable assistance.
Group Vacation
Space, equipment and consistent instructions shape a shared stay. Access failures or missing essentials affect several guests at once. These scenarios expand the supplied segmentation logic without adding unreported numerical differences.
07 / RECOMMENDATIONS
Four parts of a hybrid service model
Mobile hubs / help on site
The proposed Mobile Floor Managers and response teams would serve neighbourhood clusters. The concept set a 30-minute arrival target for a technician or cleaner during a critical incident. This is a proposed service target, not a measured response time or a current Sonder guarantee.
QA / checks before arrival
Digital cleaning checklists and mandatory pre-arrival photographs were proposed. AI-assisted photo review was considered for furniture and equipment defects, moving quality control towards prevention rather than reacting only to complaints.
D2C / a reason to return directly
The app was proposed as a stay and city-benefits service beyond a door key: repeat direct-booking discounts, food delivery and partner luggage storage. Such functions would need to support real value in the direct relationship.
Business Travel / a corporate service layer
A Corporate Self-Service Desk was proposed for automated billing documents and clear late-checkout options. Its purpose was to make recurring business-travel needs manageable without depending on a generic support chat.
08 / PRIORITIES
Reading the proposed roadmap
Restore the basic promise first
Access, cleanliness, functioning facilities and critical-incident assistance establish confidence in the stay. Within the recommendations, these form the operational basis for additional digital features.
Make between-stay QA repeatable
Checklists and photographs connect property condition with readiness for the next guest. QA becomes a recurring operating process rather than a one-off response to a negative review.
Build retention and direct-channel value
Benefits and extra services need reliable support behind them. This roadmap describes a proposed sequence; a complete rollout and measured churn, CAC or LTV effects are not established by the case.
09 / VALUE AND LIMITS
A churn diagnosis and a transformation plan
What the project provided
The analysis connected switching with specific service gaps: physical incidents, property condition, limited flexibility and weak direct-channel value. It informed recommendations for product, support, cleaning and corporate service.
Interpreting 72% and 64%
Both figures come from the supplied research case. The 72% relates to guests affected by the problems; the 64% concerns motives for using external platforms. Exact denominators, question wording and links to individual samples are not disclosed, so the figures are not extrapolated to the entire customer base.
Recommendation status
The project materials state that recommendations were not fully scaled. Reduced churn, increased LTV and lower CAC are not reported as achieved outcomes. The 30-minute figure remains a target in the proposed response model.
The practical lesson
A digital interface needs an operational team able to fulfil its promise in physical space. The case shows how customer research can identify the boundaries of App-First Hospitality and define a more practical hybrid-service proposition.